Daily Archives: November 1, 2006

Building Profile: Quantum on the Bay

Quantum is a two tower project that stands on 1900 N. Bayshore Dr. The project design comes from the drawing boards of Nichols Brosch Wurst Wulf and Associates. The land acquisition made by Mr. Martin’s Terra Group was brilliant in this case. He purchased two lots—one which was a retirement community. The other smaller south lot was vacant. Nevertheless, at the time of the projects inception, there were no other condominiums on N. Bayshore Dr except the Grand and the Venetia. BCOM did have plans for the 1800 Club but it was planned for rental units. Tibor Hollo’s plans for the Opera Tower were also rental units only. The sales of Quantum units helped change the status quo as all the other new developments, including what later became Cite, switched over to condominiums.

The well designed towers are across from the bay front Margaret Pace Park, which I consider to be the hidden jewel of Miami’s urban parks, and is located a handful of blocks away from the Omni and the PAC, is a one minute drive away from the Venetian Causeway, and has an iconic spot in the Miami skyline. From the park’s vantage point the entire area of N. Bayshore Dr. will look like its own skyline. Bay views are enjoyed by almost all, with the exception of west and south units in the south tower which may be blocked by the 1800 Club. The development of Portico on the west side of the Quantum property may compromise city views for Quantum residents. The balcony railings are not glass and the terraces are not deep at 5 feet in width. Considering the height of the building, the terraces could have been at least one foot deeper. Believe it or not, it makes a significant difference to the dweller. The lower 6 levels have lofts with 13ft high ceilings. The upper three floors on both towers have 10 foot ceiling heights. The rest of the tower residences have 9ft ceiling heights. The project is dense with over 500 units on 66,598 square feet of land.

The Quantum south tower is a good example of the difference ceiling heights make in the overall building’s height. Although the Opera Tower has 56 floors (543ft), it stands less tall than the 51 floor Quantum South Tower (554ft). The difference is that the Quantum tower residences have 9 foot high ceilings versus the Opera Tower’s 8’8 foot high ceilings. Additionally, Quantum has the 13 foot high lofts at the base. Considering how when one is buying a condo one is really buying air space, the importance of additional cubic space, even if its 4 vertical inches spread around 1,000 square feet, cannot be understated. It affects the quality of life and appeal of the unit. Quantum is a fine example of good ceiling heights. The property does not have as much glass as other buildings on N. Bayshore Drive, such as 1800 Club and Paramount on the Bay, but NBWW and Associates makes up for it with a sophisticated retro design that incorporates past and present architectural themes. The Quantum development has more pros than it does cons. The property almost looks like a large scale hotel. Amenities include two pools, a recreation deck, two fitness facilities, media rooms, club rooms with billiard tables, an indoor putting green, 24 hour valet and security, finger-print building access, a feng-shui design emphasis in the interior, and an elegant porte-cochere entrance. More importantly, as one the project’s slogans claims, as a resident, in this building you can “surround yourself” with the bay, the park, the PAC, and all the other important facilities near by.

Leave a comment

Filed under Residential Developments, Uptown: Edgewater

Don’t Block My View!

On the surface, Island Gardens appears to be an incredible development. It entails a 50 slip mega yacht marina, two world-class resorts, sleekly designed and relatively tall towers, but in digging deeper, there are problems. It will stand on one of the most important sites in the entire city. Watson Island, being situated in between both Miami Beach and Miami is as centrally located as one can imagine. The island, which belongs to the city, serves as a sort of junction point between the two urban areas. The Macarthur Causeway, of course, bisects the island and allows for the most incredible view of the CBD while heading west on the causeway from the beach. The view is really the postcard picture of Miami; literally, because if you find a postcard of Miami that doesn’t have South Beach images, it is likely to have the Watson Island view of the CBD. This famous view is now in jeopardy. I value this view because it allows me to take in the full scope of the city’s growing skyline. With Island Gardens built, it will blotch out a large portion of it.

Granted, the towers are nice, but so is the entire skyline and these wretched towers are going to compromise my beloved view of it. As to not make this personal and trite, there are other reasons why this project takes more away than it gives back. For one, the FTAA Secretariat, should Miami’s destiny as the Gateway to the Americas come to fruition and that cherished political/economic trophy come, would have to share its land with Island Gardens. I understand that there are those who would say “well you can’t leave the island in its current underutilized state”. I agree, but that’s not to say that there is a need to permit the IG project on that site. What if it’s not good for the site and the city? Putting all the rampant glorious development aside, there is such a thing as bad development. Even if the project is high profile, built by a foreign billionaire, and well designed and proportioned, it should not automatically result in a green light to the developer. The City of Miami Beach strongly opposes the project because it will create a traffic nightmare near the center of the bay. The residents of Palm, Hibiscus, and the Venetian Islands are opposing the development also. They bought on those exclusive island properties in part because of the unsurpassable value of their views. Is this to say that these people’s spoils should be maintained? No. I enjoy that same view too and so do thousands of Miamians and tourists.

The developer is offering 100 feet of public space as part of the deal. That is pitiful. Not worthy of further consideration except to say that it truly exemplifies my argument that the project does not offer the city much except tax revenues. What was once an island of the people is slated to become an Island built out by a Turkish billionaire who understandably may not realize the significance of the view he’s blocking and the transportation problems his project will likely create. Either that or he does not care—probably the latter. What is sad is that the city doesn’t seem to care either. It is also rather disappointing to see my fellow development enthusiasts blindly support such an offensive idea as to jeopardize what is arguably the best view of our city.

I am aware of the supposed benefits of this project: more tax revenue, new tall towers, another luxurious destination for the jet set, 221,000 new sq ft of retail space, an unprecedented mega-yacht marina for the ultra rich, more luxury hotel rooms added to the hospitality market, and job creation. But these benefits, with the exception of the mega yacht facility and retail space, sound much like the benefits of developments in Sunny Isles, South Beach, and Miami. The difference is that this development will cast a shadow over the FTAA facility, should we get it, will create traffic woes for Miami Beach, and will compromise the most important public view of the city. Unless you’re a jet setter from some other city who plans on visiting Miami and staying in this resort, or a mega yacht owner who plans on using the facility, or a member of the developer’s team, you don’t stand to benefit much from this project. Although it seems clear that the city will allow the project to go forth, I feel that it is important to demonstrate my earnest opposition to what I believe is a detrimental development that represents a stain in the political and economic partnership between Miami and Miami Beach.


Leave a comment

Filed under BoB Articles